🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.