🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.